What is very interestingly engaging about parliamentary systems of government is that you might win an election but nothing says you'd finish your tenure. Let alone refusing or unable to form a tenure.
Nobody is deceived anymore about the soapy excuse that "we are cleaning Jonathan's mess"
Nor has the novel use of Permanent secretaries proved effective.
The reason there isn't a government and an economic policy is very simple.
The APC, made up of ambitious people, ran and "won" an election without a program beyond pipe dream promises. Elections all over the world are expensive. Buhari does not have the money to unseat a local government chairman.
As Tinubu was the national leader, he had thought that his model of installing governors in the Southwest with a view to bleeding them financially would work on a national scale.
He was oblivious of the PDP bloc in the National Assembly.
Buhari too, will be right to have a very strong suspicion for Osibanjo because the constitution says, Osibanjo becomes president "in the case,,,,etc.
That model has not panned out for Tinubu. Now a new method is being tried. To command everything.
But all systems designed to snuff out the other people ultimately reveals a hollow core. If APC is able to have its way, it'd amount to a monopoly. And everybody knows ( or should know)that monopolies produce bad products at high prices. If there's no opposition, customers( Nigerians) have no alternatives, and if there is no alternative, customers accept whatever a monopoly decides to produce and pay whatever the monopoly decides to charge.
There has never been an industry, product, government or system that competition has not improved.
Nigeria's Presidential system runs like a monopoly and the way APC came to power makes it look a competition.
That's why Buhari is not able to form a government.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please tell us what you fill about this post